Legal Opinion

Register v. Administrative Office of the Courts

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 16, 1984No. 8310IC1161PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, Judge.

The facts in this case are not in substantial dispute. The only question raised by plaintiff on appeal is whether the Industrial Commission erred in finding that plaintiffs alleged damages were not proximately caused by the negligence of AOC or its employee, Mrs. Lewallen, and concluding that he was not entitled to a recovery. We find no merit in plaintiffs contention and affirm the decision of the Full Commission.

In order for a person to recover under the State Tort Claims Act, it must be shown that a negligent act of a state employee, acting in the course of his or her…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bailey v. North Carolina Department of Mental HealthSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. Branch Banking & Trust Co. v. Wilson County Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  3. Tanner v. State Department of CorrectionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
  4. Mason v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  5. McGaha v. Smoky Mountain Stages, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Simmons v. North Carolina Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  2. Carroll v. Burlington IndustriesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  3. Nunn v. N.C. Department of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  4. Bell v. N.C. D.O.C.North Carolina Industrial Commission · 2004
  5. Brunson v. N.C. Department of CorrectionNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · 2006

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API