Legal Opinion
Mason v. North Carolina State Highway Commission
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided February 28, 1968No. 768PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLake, J.
The record does not contain an express ruling by the majority of the Full Commission upon the motion of the claimants for the taking of further evidence and for permission to amend their affidavits. However, the memorandum of dissent by the unidentified commissioner, which is a part of the record, leads inescapably to the conclusion that the Full Commission did consider this motion and refused to allow it.
G.S. 143-291 provides that the Industrial Commission “is hereby constituted a court for the purpose of hearing and passing upon tort claims” against this defendant and other agencies of the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Henry v. A. C. Lawrence Leather Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Johnson v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- Hall v. Thomason Chevrolet, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Bailey v. North Carolina Department of Mental HealthSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Butts v. . Montague Bros.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Byers v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- Register v. Administrative Office of the CourtsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Tanner v. State Department of CorrectionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
- Grupen v. Thomasville Furniture IndustriesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
- Owens v. STANDARD MINERAL COMPANYCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.