Legal Opinion

Lanier v. North Carolina State Highway Commission

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 3, 1976No. 762IC384PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Judge.

In his sole assignment of error, claimant contends that the Commission erred in its failure to find, as a matter of law, that the pit in question was an attractive nuisance. In reviewing an order of the Industrial Commission, we are guided by the principle that the order will stand if its findings of fact are supported by competent evidence and if its conclusions of law are supported by the findings of fact. Tanner v. Dept. of Correction, 19 N.C. App. 689, 200 S.E. 2d 350 (1973).

At the time of the drowning, deceased was at the excavation site without invitation or license from…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Briscoe v. Henderson Lighting & Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  2. McCombs v. City of AsheboroCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
  3. Fitch v. Selwyn Village, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  4. Tanner v. State Department of CorrectionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
  5. Dean v. Wilson Construction CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Samuel v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Coleman v. RudisillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  3. Forte v. Dillard Paper Co. of Raleigh, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  4. Griffin v. WoodardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API