Legal Opinion

Harris v. FRANK L. BLUM CONSTRUCTION COMPANY

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 24, 1971No. 7121IC9PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MALLARD, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff contends that the facts contained in paragraph number 7 of the findings of fact of the deputy commissioner and adopted by the Commission are not supported by competent medical testimony. This contention is without merit. The findings are supported by the competent testimony of Dr. de la Torre. It is established law in North Carolina that conflicts in the evidence are to be resolved by the Commission and that findings of fact by the Commission (except jurisdictional facts) are conclusive upon appeal when supported by competent evidence. Anderson v. Construction…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Anderson v. LINCOLN CONSTRUCTION COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  2. Austin Joseph Ryan v. United States Lines CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  3. Hall v. Thomason Chevrolet, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  4. Morgan v. Thomasville Furniture Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
  5. State v. . CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Lynch v. M. B. Kahn Construction Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Tanner v. State Department of CorrectionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
  3. Grupen v. Thomasville Furniture IndustriesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  4. Benfield v. TroutmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
  5. Fofar v. Williamson County Airport AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API