Legal Opinion

Skinner v. Jernigan

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 23, 1959No. 27PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPaekeR, J.

Both defendants assign as error the refusal of the trial court to dismiss both actions upon compulsory nonsuits at the close of all the evidence. G.S. 1-183.

Counsel for the defendants strenuously contend that both actions should have been involuntarily nonsuited in the Superior Court. They made the same contention on the first appeal, and their argument on the second appeal in their brief is merely an elaboration of their argument on the same question in their brief on the first appeal. We are compelled to hold under our decisions that this question is foreclosed against the defendants by our…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hunt v. WootenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. Rollison v. HicksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. Glenn Ex Rel. Glenn v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  4. Whiteside v. McCarsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  5. Richardson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Bowen v. GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  2. DeArmon v. B. Mears Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  3. Boykin v. BennettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  4. Old Second National Bank v. BaumannAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  5. Tanner v. State Department of CorrectionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API