Vandervort v. Industrial Commission
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtOwen, J.
The plaintiffs, O. D. Y. Vandervort and Louis Heinz, are both farmers by occupation. Shortly prior to August 12, 1927, they entered into a contract with one Mrs. Acker to move her house for a consideration of $500. James A. Bolton, one of the defendants, was employed by them to assist in moving the house. A bridge over which the house was being moved, on August 12, 1927, fell into the river, as a result of which the defendant Bolton received physical injuries. Upon his application the Industrial Commission made an award requiring the plaintiffs, O. D. Y. Vandervort and Louis Heinz, to pay to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State ex rel. Lennon v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- Kaplan v. GaskillNebraska Supreme Court · 1922
- Pfister v. Doon Electric Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1925
- Kimberly-Clark Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
- Kelley v. HaylockWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Frisbie v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- Newman v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
- Dillard v. JonesIdaho Supreme Court · 1937
- International Harvester Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
- Jackson v. Cathcart & Maxfield, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.