Legal Opinion

Kaplan v. Gaskill

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1922No. 22503PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFlansburg, J.

This was an action under the workmen’s compensation law. An award was granted to the employee, G-askill, both at the hearing before the compensation commissioner, and also in the proceeding, later instituted, in the district court. From the decree in the district court, the employer, Kaplan, appeals.

*457The questions of law presented are whether or not thé employment was “casual,” and whether or not it was an employment in the usual course of “the trade, business, profession or occupation” of the employer.

The evidence in behalf of the employee is to the effect that Ivaplan, the employer, was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Thompson v. TwissSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
  2. State ex rel. Lennon v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  3. Oliphant v. HawkinsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
  4. Davis v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Lauzier v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Gardner v. Trustees of Main Street Methodist Episcopal ChurchSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
  2. Sherlock v. SherlockNebraska Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Decarli v. Manchester Public Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
  4. Dancy v. Abraham Bros. Packing Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Sink v. PharaohSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API