Kimberly-Clark Co. v. Industrial Commission
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtVinje, C. J.
' The only question raised upon this appeal is whether or not there was any credible evidence introduced from which the Commission could reasonably come to the conclusion that the making of the tool box was an act within the scope of and incidental to the employment of the claimant. It is undisputed that the company furnished him no adequate tools, or, if they were furnished, they were not kept in a place where he could promptly and with certainty get them. Under such circumstances the Commission could properly find that the making of a tool box within which to keep his tools securely locked…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Milwaukee Western Fuel Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
- Northwestern Iron Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
- Racine Rubber Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1917
- Radtke Bros. & Korsch Co. v. RutzinskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
- Brienen v. Wisconsin Public Service Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1917
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- American Motors Corp. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
- Sauerwein v. Department of Industry & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- Employers Mutual Liability Insurance v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
- Vandervort v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
- Badger Furniture Co. v. Industrial Commission of WisconsinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.