Legal Opinion

Newman v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 13, 1931PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.

The sole question presented upon this appeal is whether or not the deceased son of the claimants met his death from a hazard peculiar to or arising out *360of his employment and therefore compensable, or whether his death was the result of a hazard common to persons generally and therefore not compensable under the workmen’s compensation act.

Some language used by the court in Eagle River B. & S. Co. v. Industrial Comm. 199 Wis. 192, 225 N. W. 693, appears to be the basis of an argument to the effect that Hoenig v. Industrial Comm. 159 Wis. 646, 150 N. W. 996, is not the law. In the Hoenig Case it…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hoenig v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Matter of Madura v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
  3. Vandervort v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Eagle River Building & Supply Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Schmidt v. SadekWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Caswell's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  2. School District No. 1 v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Volunteers of America of Madison, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Lewellyn v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Bergren v. SE GUSTAFSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANYSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1955

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API