Legal Opinion
Jackson v. Cathcart & Maxfield, Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 7, 1938No. 31,187PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
1 Reported in 277 N.W. 22. Certiorari brings for review an order of the industrial commission granting employe-respondent compensation. We shall refer to him as claimant.
The facts are not in substantial dispute and may be summarized in this fashion: Mary A. Maloy, a long-time resident of Ramsey county, died in June, 1924, testate. To each of the relators, her daughters, was given an undivided one-fourth interest in two apartment buildings in St. Paul. They later acquired an additional three-eighths interest — through the death of a brother and by purchase from another sister — so that at all…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Fairfield v. County of GallatinSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- O'Rourke v. Percy Vittum Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Oliphant v. HawkinsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
- Kaplan v. GaskillNebraska Supreme Court · 1922
- Setter v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Aleckson v. Kennedy Motor Sales Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- Krause v. Trustees of Hamline University of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Muscatine City Water Works v. DugeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
- Kolbeck v. MyhraSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- Chisholm v. DavisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.