Legal Opinion
Adams v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 28, 2010No. Civil Action No.: 09-2459 (RMU)PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Granting in Part and Denying in Part the Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint; Denying as Moot the Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint
RICARDO M. URBINA, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter comes before the court on the defendant’s motion to dismiss the second amended complaint. The plaintiff alleges that the defendant subjected him to disparate treatment on the basis of his disability and to a hostile work environment in violation of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (“Rehabilitation Act”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 701 et seq., the…
2Cases cited72 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Ward v. D.C. Department of Youth Rehabilitation ServicesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Peters v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- JAIYEOLA v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- Mokhtar v. ClintonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Congress v. Dist. of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.