Legal Opinion
Mortimer v. Loynes
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 25, 1946No. Civ. No. 1406PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOX, J. pro tem.
This is an appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment in favor of the defendants.
The action, generally speaking, is prosecuted by the plaintiff, Building and Loan Commissioner, as liquidator of the Mutual Building & Loan Association of Long Beach, for the purpose of recovering $7,398.59, alleged to have been wrongfully withheld by the defendants from the association in connection with the sale of a furnished apartment house that belonged to the association.
In view of the questions that must be considered it is necessary to set forth the allegations of the amended-complaint in…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
- Lady Washington Consolidated Co. v. WoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Philpott v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Bainbridge v. StonerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Consolidated Reservoir & Power Co. v. ScarboroughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Schaefer v. BerinsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Stevens v. MarcoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Van De Kamp v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Jogani v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Lee v. HensleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.