Nautilus Marine Enterprises, Inc. v. Exxon Mobil Corporation
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STOWERS, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
In September 2006 Exxon Mobil Corporation and Exxon Shipping Company (collectively "Exxon") entered into a Settlement Agreement with two seafood processors, Nautilus Marine Enterprises (Nautilus) and Cook Inlet Processing (Cook Inlet). The agreement contained the following language: "Exxon and the Seafood Processors agree that the issue of the correct rate of prejudgment interest in this case shall be submitted to the [United States] District Court for resolution and entry of an appropriate judgment...." It also noted that the "Final Judgment shall be in…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Peterson v. WirumAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. O'KELLEYAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
- Municipality of Anchorage v. GentileAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
- Wright v. VickaryousAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Norville v. Carr-Gottstein Foods Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2004
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Nautilus Marine Enterprises, Inc. v. Exxon Mobil Corporation & Exxon Shipping Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2014
- Laybourn v. City of WasillaAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
- Mahan v. MahanAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
- Black v. Whitestone Estates Condo. Homeowners' Ass'nAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
- Blair v. Federal Insurance CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.