Nautilus Marine Enterprises, Inc. v. Exxon Mobil Corporation & Exxon Shipping Co.
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MAASSEN, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
The superior court issued a declaratory judgment interpreting a settlement agreement between Nautilus Marine Enterprises (Nautilus) and Exxon, 1 then decided that Exxon was the prevailing party. Nautilus appeals the ensuing awards of attorney fees and costs as excessive. It focuses particularly on the out-of-state hourly billing rates that the superior court accepted, the number of hours billed, and the court's imposition of a fee enhancement and sanction. Nautilus also contests the court's determination of prevailing party status, its award of costs,…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Arbor Hill Concerned Citizens Neighborhood Ass'n v. County of Albany & Albany County Board of ElectionsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Darnella BARJON and Lee Duran, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. John H. DALTON, Secretary of the Navy, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Rum Creek Coal Sales, Inc. v. CapertonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
- 28 Fair empl.prac.cas. 19, 28 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 32,459 Alta Chrapliwy, and Cross-Appellees v. Uniroyal, Inc., a Corporation, and Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- Everett Hadix v. Perry JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Adkins v. CollensAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
- Cooper v. ThompsonAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
- Alaskasland.com, LLC v. CrossAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
- Riddle v. LanserAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
- Haines v. Comfort Keepers, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2017
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.