Legal Opinion

Nautilus Marine Enterprises, Inc. v. Exxon Mobil Corporation & Exxon Shipping Co.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided August 22, 2014No. 6942 S-14736PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MAASSEN, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

The superior court issued a declaratory judgment interpreting a settlement agreement between Nautilus Marine Enterprises (Nautilus) and Exxon, 1 then decided that Exxon was the prevailing party. Nautilus appeals the ensuing awards of attorney fees and costs as excessive. It focuses particularly on the out-of-state hourly billing rates that the superior court accepted, the number of hours billed, and the court's imposition of a fee enhancement and sanction. Nautilus also contests the court's determination of prevailing party status, its award of costs,…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Arbor Hill Concerned Citizens Neighborhood Ass'n v. County of Albany & Albany County Board of ElectionsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  2. Darnella BARJON and Lee Duran, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. John H. DALTON, Secretary of the Navy, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  3. Rum Creek Coal Sales, Inc. v. CapertonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
  4. 28 Fair empl.prac.cas. 19, 28 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 32,459 Alta Chrapliwy, and Cross-Appellees v. Uniroyal, Inc., a Corporation, and Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
  5. Everett Hadix v. Perry JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Adkins v. CollensAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Cooper v. ThompsonAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Alaskasland.com, LLC v. CrossAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Riddle v. LanserAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Haines v. Comfort Keepers, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2017

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API