Norville v. Carr-Gottstein Foods Co.
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MATTHEWS, Justice.
INTRODUCTION
The question presented is whether a landlord’s refusal to consent to a sublease was unreasonable. The superior court granted summary judgment in favor of the tenant on this issue. We conclude that this was error because there were genuine issues of material fact and the tenant was not entitled to judgment as a matter of law.
FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
Allan Norville owns a shopping center in Kenai. Beginning in 1991, Carr-Gottstein Foods Co. (Carrs), leased space in the center under a twenty-five year lease. In 1995 Carrs asked Norville to consent to a sublease…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Peterson v. WirumAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- Kendall v. Ernest Pestana, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1985
- McGary v. Westlake InvestorsWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- Day v. a & G Construction Co., Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Municipality of Anchorage v. GentileAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Van Sloun v. Agans Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2010
- Sowinski v. WalkerAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
- Beal v. McGuireAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
- Simon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2005
- Shaffer v. BellowsAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.