Legal Opinion

Norville v. Carr-Gottstein Foods Co.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 2004No. S-10643, S-10684PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATTHEWS, Justice.

INTRODUCTION

The question presented is whether a landlord’s refusal to consent to a sublease was unreasonable. The superior court granted summary judgment in favor of the tenant on this issue. We conclude that this was error because there were genuine issues of material fact and the tenant was not entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

Allan Norville owns a shopping center in Kenai. Beginning in 1991, Carr-Gottstein Foods Co. (Carrs), leased space in the center under a twenty-five year lease. In 1995 Carrs asked Norville to consent to a sublease…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Peterson v. WirumAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Kendall v. Ernest Pestana, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1985
  3. McGary v. Westlake InvestorsWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Day v. a & G Construction Co., Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Municipality of Anchorage v. GentileAlaska Supreme Court · 1996

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Van Sloun v. Agans Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2010
  2. Sowinski v. WalkerAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Beal v. McGuireAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Simon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2005
  5. Shaffer v. BellowsAlaska Supreme Court · 2011

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API