Legal Opinion
Peterson v. Wirum
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided March 27, 1981No. 4704PublishedCited by 101 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before RABINOWITZ, C. J., CONNOR, BOOCHEVER and BURKE, JJ., and HANSON, Superior Court Judge. * RABINOWITZ, Chief Justice.
The parties to this appeal are partners in a partnership known as Peterson Towers Associates (PTA), formed for the purpose of constructing and operating an office and condominium complex in Anchorage. The partners are appellant Leah Peterson (one-third interest), appellees Harold Wirum and Mary Wirum (collectively a one-third interest), and appellees Vernon Hickel and Louis Palmer (collectively a one-third interest). 1 Substantial differences arose among the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Stordahl v. Government Employees Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1977
- Day v. a & G Construction Co., Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Wright v. VickaryousAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Wessells v. State, Department of HighwaysAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
- National Bank of Alaska v. J. B. L. & K. of Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1976
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by101 opinions
- Mitford v. De LasalaAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
- Ellingstad v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
- Municipality of Anchorage v. GentileAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
- Norville v. Carr-Gottstein Foods Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2004
- Mullen v. ChristiansenAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.