Legal Opinion

Mahan v. Mahan

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 2015No. 6991 S-15456PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FABE, Chief Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

A husband and wife obtained a marriage dissolution that included a provision to split the "profits ... after the cost of fuel and can[nelry dues" from their jointly owned commercial fishing boat. The ex-spouses dispute the meaning of the term "profits." Each party maintains that the other owes a large sum of money pursuant to the agreement. The superior court approved a standing master's recommendation that interpreted "profits" to mean "payment from the cannery, less deductions for fuel, dues and other advancements." Because the superior court's findings…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Peterson v. WirumAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. O'KELLEYAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Norville v. Carr-Gottstein Foods Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Fairbanks North Star Borough v. Tundra Tours, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Alaska Diversified Contractors, Inc. v. Lower Kuskokwim School DistrictAlaska Supreme Court · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Flint Hills Resources Alaska, LLC v. Williams Alaska Petroleum, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Herring v. HerringAlaska Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Gunn v. GunnAlaska Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Black v. Whitestone Estates Condo. Homeowners' Ass'nAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Miller v. FowlerAlaska Supreme Court · 2018

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API