Legal Opinion

Wright v. Vickaryous

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided August 3, 1979No. 4079, 4080PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BOOCHEVER, Justice.

This is a dispute between two stubborn Matanuska Valley farmers, Sande Wright and Jim Vickaryous, arising from a lease agreement for Cottonwood Dairy Farm. 1

Wright challenges several aspects of the trial court’s decision: the order allowing amendment of the complaint, the construction of the lease as a month-to-month tenancy and the Vickaryouses right to crops harvested by Wright, a holdover tenant. Further, Wright challenges various rulings relating to damages, including application of the collateral source rule to insurance proceeds received by a landlord.

Sande…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Holiday Inns of America, Inc. v. PeckAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Stordahl v. Government Employees Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Day v. a & G Construction Co., Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Wessells v. State, Department of HighwaysAlaska Supreme Court · 1977

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Peterson v. WirumAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Miller v. SearsAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  3. O'Neill Investigations, Inc. v. Illinois Employers Insurance of WausauAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  4. State v. First National Bank of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. O'KELLEYAlaska Supreme Court · 1982

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API