Legal Opinion
Laybourn v. City of Wasilla
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided December 11, 2015No. 7068 S-15478/S-15488PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MAASSEN, Justice.
J. INTRODUCTION
Property owners granted a utility casement to the Clty of Wasilla in exchange for the City's promise to build an access road across their property, subject to obtalmng permits and funding, The access road was not built, and the property owners sued the City, claiming that it fraudulently induced them- to sign the easement agreement, breached the agreement, and breached the covenant of good faith and fair dealing.
After trial the superior court made findings of fact and conclusions of law about the parties' negotiations, their reasonable expectations, the…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Dayan v. McDonald's Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1984
- Peterson v. WirumAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- Wright v. VickaryousAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- MidAmerica Construction Management, Inc. v. MasTec North America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Norville v. Carr-Gottstein Foods Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2004
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Burton v. Fountainhead Development, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2017
- Dickson v. State, Dept. of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
- David Griffith v. Roger Hemphill and Donald DavisAlaska Supreme Court · 2022
- Williams Alaska Petroleum, Inc. and The Williams Companies, Inc. v. State of Alaska, Flint Hills Resources Alaska, LLC, and Flint Hills Resources, LLCAlaska Supreme Court · 2023
- Gavora, Inc. v. City of FairbanksAlaska Supreme Court · 2021
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.