Legal Opinion

Bess v. DirecTV, Inc.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 24, 2004No. 5-03-0290PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Donovan

This appeal arises from an order of the circuit court of St. Clair County denying the motion of DirecTV Inc. (DirecTV), to stay proceedings in a class action suit and to compel arbitration. The motion was based upon the DirecTV “Customer Agreement” with plaintiff, Charlotte Bess. That agreement recites that any claim asserted by either party against the other, if not resolved informally, “will be resolved only by binding arbitration,” to be conducted under the commercial arbitration rules of the American Arbitration Association. The court found the arbitration provision to be “substantively…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Green Tree Financial Corp. v. BazzleSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. Gibson v. Neighborhood Health Clinics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bess v. DirecTV, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2008
  2. Zobrist v. Verizon WirelessAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  3. Kinkel v. Cingular Wireless, LLCAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  4. Ragan v. AT & T CORP.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  5. Gipson v. Cross Country BankDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API