Legal Opinion

Green Tree Financial Corp. v. Bazzle

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 23, 2003No. 02-634PublishedCited by 499 opinions

1Judgment of the CourtJustice Breyer

This case concerns contracts between a commercial lender and its customers, each of which contains a clause providing for arbitration of all contract-related disputes. The Supreme Court of South Carolina held (1) that the arbitration clauses are silent as to whether arbitration might take the form of class arbitration, and (2) that, in that circumstance, South Carolina law interprets the contracts as permitting class arbitration. 351 S. C. 244, 569 S. E. 2d 349 (2002). We granted certiorari to determine whether this holding is consistent with the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U. S. C. § 1 et seq.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. LivingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by499 opinions

  1. Stolt-Nielsen S. A. v. AnimalFeeds International Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. Epic Systems Corp. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
  3. Rent-A-Center, West, Inc. v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. Perry Homes v. CullTexas Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Oxford Health Plans LLC v. SutterSupreme Court of the United States · 2013

494 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API