Legal Opinion

Kinkel v. Cingular Wireless, LLC

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 2, 2005No. 5-03-0774PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chapman

The defendant, Cingular Wireless, LLC (Cingular), appeals an order denying its motion to compel arbitration and stay a class action suit against it pending arbitration. We find that the arbitration clause itself is enforceable; however, we conclude that the clause’s limitation on class arbitration is unconscionable and thus unenforceable. Accordingly, we reverse and remand.

I. BACKGROUND

The defendant provides cellular telephone service. Pursuant to its service agreement, customers agree to maintain service with Cingular for specified periods of time or “service terms.” If customers wish to…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Deposit Guaranty National Bank v. RoperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Green Tree Financial Corp. v. BazzleSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Kinkel v. Cingular Wireless, LLCIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Muhammad v. County Bank of Rehoboth Beach, DelawareSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2006
  3. Tortoriello v. Gerald Nissan of North Aurora, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2008
  4. Discover Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  5. Cooper v. QC Financial Services, Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 2007

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API