Legal Opinion

Ragan v. AT & T CORP.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 1, 2005No. 5-03-0038PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE DONOVAN

delivered the opinion of the court:

This is an appeal from the denial of a motion to compel arbitration and to dismiss or stay proceedings in a putative class action lawsuit brought by Sandra K. Ragan and Dennis Mangiaracino, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated (plaintiffs), against AT&T Corp. (defendant), pursuant to the Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act (815 ILCS 505/1 et seq. (West 2002)) and “substantially similar state consumer protection statutes enacted to protect consumers against unfair, deceptive!,] or fraudulent business…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Rajesh Gupta v. Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
  2. Kinkel v. Cingular Wireless, LLCAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  3. Hollingshead v. A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  4. Fosler v. Midwest Care Center II, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  5. Brent Bauer v. Qwest Communications CorporatCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API