Zobrist v. Verizon Wireless
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kuehn
This appeal stems from the trial court’s October 7, 2003, order denying the defendants’ motion to compel arbitration and stay judicial proceedings. The contract provision at issue provides that the majority of the claims between the parties “shall be settled by binding arbitration in accordance with the Commercial Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association (‘Rules’)” and that “[a] judgment upon the award rendered by the arbitrator may be entered in any court of competent jurisdiction.” The trial court essentially concluded that the arbitration clause at issue was unenforceable…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Shearson/American Express Inc. v. McMahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Kinkel v. Cingular Wireless, LLCIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
- Melena v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 2006
- Dubey v. Public Storage, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2009
- Tortoriello v. Gerald Nissan of North Aurora, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2008
- Bess v. DirecTV, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2008
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.