At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications Workers
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice White
The issue presented in this case is whether a court asked to order arbitration of a grievance filed under a collective-bargaining agreement must first determine that the parties intended to arbitrate the dispute, or whether that determination is properly left to the arbitrator.
HH
AT&T Technologies, Inc. (AT&T or the Company), and the Communications Workers of America (the Union) are parties to a collective-bargaining agreement which covers telephone equipment installation workers. Article 8 of this agreement *645establishes that “differences arising with respect to the interpretation of this…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. LivingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4,268 opinions
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United Paperworkers International Union v. Misco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Henry Schein, Inc. v. Archer & White Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2019
- Stolt-Nielsen S. A. v. AnimalFeeds International Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
4,263 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.