Legal Opinion

At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications Workers

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 7, 1986No. 84-1913PublishedCited by 4,268 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice White

The issue presented in this case is whether a court asked to order arbitration of a grievance filed under a collective-bargaining agreement must first determine that the parties intended to arbitrate the dispute, or whether that determination is properly left to the arbitrator.

HH

AT&T Technologies, Inc. (AT&T or the Company), and the Communications Workers of America (the Union) are parties to a collective-bargaining agreement which covers telephone equipment installation workers. Article 8 of this agreement *645establishes that “differences arising with respect to the interpretation of this…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. LivingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4,268 opinions

  1. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. United Paperworkers International Union v. Misco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Henry Schein, Inc. v. Archer & White Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2019
  5. Stolt-Nielsen S. A. v. AnimalFeeds International Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010

4,263 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API