Laundry Service Co. v. Fidelity Laundry MacHinery & Engineering Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtHilton, J.
Plaintiff is engaged in the general laundry and dry-cleaning business. Defendant is a corporation engaged in the manufacture of equipment for use in such business. Both parties are located in Minneapolis.
Prior to January, 1929, plaintiff had purchased certain equipment from defendant and was operating the same in January, 1929. In that month plaintiff purchased from defendant a Unipress machine. It Avas for use in pressing the bosom, body, and neck band of shirts. This machine was shortly thereafter installed in plaintiff’s place of business. The sale was on open account; no payments Avere…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Butler Manufacturing Co. v. Elliott & CoxSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
- Stewart v. B. R. Menzel Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Manos v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- Laganas Shoe Manufacturing Co. v. SharoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- Advance-Rumely Thresher Co. v. WhartonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Truesdale v. FriedmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Heibel v. United States Air Conditioning Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- Hemming v. Ald, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Federal Motor Truck Sales Corp. v. ShanusSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- DeWitt v. Itasca-Mantrap Cooperative Electrical Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.