Hemming v. Ald, Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Peterson, Justice.
Respondents purchased automatic laundry and dry-cleaning equipment from appellant Aid, Inc., on July 20, 1962, and rescinded the purchase agreement on June 25, 1963, on grounds of fraud: Respondents recovered, upon a jury verdict, all sum's paid to appellants under the purchase agreement.
Three issues are presented upon appeal from the denial of appellants’ post-trial motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial: (1) Whether, as a matter of law, respondents lost their right to rescind by failure to do so within a reasonable time after discovery of the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Beck v. SpindlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- Halloran v. BLUE AND WHITE LIBERTY CAB CO. INC.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Knutson v. Arrigoni Brothers Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- Truesdale v. FriedmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Heibel v. United States Air Conditioning Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Damon v. GroteboerDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2013
- Clements Auto Co. v. Service Bureau Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
- Petition of LinehanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Evanson v. JerowskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Digital Resource v. Abacor, Inc. (In Re Digital Resource, LLC)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.