Legal Opinion

Hemming v. Ald, Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 22, 1967No. 40502PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peterson, Justice.

Respondents purchased automatic laundry and dry-cleaning equipment from appellant Aid, Inc., on July 20, 1962, and rescinded the purchase agreement on June 25, 1963, on grounds of fraud: Respondents recovered, upon a jury verdict, all sum's paid to appellants under the purchase agreement.

Three issues are presented upon appeal from the denial of appellants’ post-trial motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial: (1) Whether, as a matter of law, respondents lost their right to rescind by failure to do so within a reasonable time after discovery of the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Beck v. SpindlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  2. Halloran v. BLUE AND WHITE LIBERTY CAB CO. INC.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  3. Knutson v. Arrigoni Brothers Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  4. Truesdale v. FriedmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  5. Heibel v. United States Air Conditioning Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Damon v. GroteboerDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2013
  2. Clements Auto Co. v. Service Bureau Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
  3. Petition of LinehanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  4. Evanson v. JerowskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  5. Digital Resource v. Abacor, Inc. (In Re Digital Resource, LLC)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API