Legal Opinion

Stewart v. B. R. Menzel Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 10, 1930No. 28,085PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Losing, C.

This was a suit to recover the purchase price of a fur coat, bought from the defendant at its store in Minneapolis, March 5, 1928, under an alleged rescission of the purchase for breach of warranty on November 5, 1928.

Plaintiff alleges that he and his wife purchased a Hudson seal coat on the date mentioned and that defendant “guaranteed” it to be “a first-class garment.” Defendant admits that it so represented the coat and still claims that it is such. Plaintiff’s wife immediately wore the coat for three or four weeks and came to the conclusion it was not as represented. She spent…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rosenfield v. SwensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Mawhinney v. JensenUtah Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Truesdale v. FriedmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  3. Heibel v. United States Air Conditioning Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  4. Federal Motor Truck Sales Corp. v. ShanusSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  5. Laundry Service Co. v. Fidelity Laundry MacHinery & Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API