Legal Opinion

Advance-Rumely Thresher Co. v. Wharton

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 9, 1930No. 40366PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wagner, J.-

-The plaintiff, Advance-Rumely Thresher Company, a corporation, has its head office at La Porte, Indiana, and a branch office at Omaha, Nebraska. It also has a local agent at Onawa, Iowa. The defendant is a boot manufacturer, living in Omaha, who owns and operates a considerable quantity of land in this state, in close proximity to Onawa and Mon- damin. On June 28, 1928, the defendant, by a written contract, purchased from the plaintiff at its branch office in Omaha a Number 3 Rumely-Combine harvester, to be delivered at Onawa, Iowa. The purchaser executed two notes, to be applied…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Minneapolis Threshing MacH. Co. v. HockingNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Cream City Glass Co. v. FriedlanderWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Upton Manuf'g Co. v. HuiskeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
  4. King v. TowsleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1884
  5. Churchill v. PriceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1878

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kilpatrick v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945
  2. Butler Manufacturing Co. v. Elliott & CoxSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  3. Kengorco, Inc. v. JorgensonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1970
  4. Storck v. PascoeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1955
  5. Laundry Service Co. v. Fidelity Laundry MacHinery & Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API