Legal Opinion
Federal Motor Truck Sales Corp. v. Shanus
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided November 3, 1933No. 29,441PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLT, Justice.
The appeal is by plaintiff from the order denying its motion in the alternative for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial.
Plaintiff’s action was to foreclose a conditional sales contract for the sale of a truck by plaintiff to defendant. Defendant by an amended answer alleged that the truck was sold with a warranty of fitness; that there ivas a breach of the warranty in that the brakes would not and could not be made to function properly, although plaintiff had repeatedly attempted to remedy the defects therein without avail; that on account of failure to make the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bekkevold v. PottsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Iron Fireman Coal Stoker Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Stewart v. B. R. Menzel Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Laundry Service Co. v. Fidelity Laundry MacHinery & Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
- Laganas Shoe Manufacturing Co. v. SharoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- Durfee v. Rod Baxter Imports, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Beck v. SpindlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- Despatch Oven Co. v. RauenhorstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Dougall v. Brown Bay Boat Works and Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.