Legal Opinion

Manos v. St. Paul City Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 20, 1928No. 26,415PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.

Appeal from an order denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial.

Plaintiff was riding in an automobile as the guest of the owner and driver thereof. Its line of travel was to the west and across a north and south street-upon which were defendant’s tracks. There was a collision between the automobile and a southbound street car. Plaintiff sued to recover for alleged injuries.

The following is plaintiff’s version of the accident: The automobile came to a stop at the curb line of the cross street. The street car was then one-half to three-fourths of a block to the north traveling 20 to 25 miles…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Barrett v. Virginian Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. Carson v. TurrishSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
  3. Bradley v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  4. McKellar v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  5. Jones v. SchreiberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ryan v. GriffinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  2. Mix v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  3. O'Neill v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  4. Olson v. ByamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  5. Laundry Service Co. v. Fidelity Laundry MacHinery & Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API