Manos v. St. Paul City Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.
Appeal from an order denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial.
Plaintiff was riding in an automobile as the guest of the owner and driver thereof. Its line of travel was to the west and across a north and south street-upon which were defendant’s tracks. There was a collision between the automobile and a southbound street car. Plaintiff sued to recover for alleged injuries.
The following is plaintiff’s version of the accident: The automobile came to a stop at the curb line of the cross street. The street car was then one-half to three-fourths of a block to the north traveling 20 to 25 miles…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Barrett v. Virginian Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Carson v. TurrishSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
- Bradley v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- McKellar v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- Jones v. SchreiberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Ryan v. GriffinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Mix v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- O'Neill v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
- Olson v. ByamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Laundry Service Co. v. Fidelity Laundry MacHinery & Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.