Laganas Shoe Manufacturing Co. v. Sharood
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.
Appeal from an order denying a motion for judgment non obstante or a new trial.
Action to recover $2,811.65 for shoes sold to defendant. The purchase is admitted. They were sold from sample. The answer alleged that the shoes were defective, unmerchantable, and not fit to wear. Shoes to the extent of $381.11 were sold by defendant, who admitted he owed plaintiff that amount. He had tendered a return of the balance of the shoes.
Plaintiff began shipping the shoes from its factory at Lowell, Massachusetts, on March 18,1925, and continued until May 25, 1925. On June 5, 1925, defendant notified…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Fiterman v. J. N. Johnson & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- Marshall Milling Co. v. Hintz-Cameron Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- Clifford v. StewartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
- Orange Crush Co. v. Stacy-Merrill Fruit Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
3Cited by8 opinions
- Mohr v. ShultzIdaho Supreme Court · 1964
- Luther v. Standard Conveyor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Inland Products Corp. v. Donovan Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Federal Motor Truck Sales Corp. v. ShanusSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- Laundry Service Co. v. Fidelity Laundry MacHinery & Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.