United States v. Tucker
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION UPON FURTHER REVIEW
HODGSON, Chief Judge:
In United States v. Rodriguez, 16 M.J. 740 (A.F.C.M.R.1983), we expressed a belief that allegations of unlawful command influence in the Air Force are not in keeping with a fair and impartial military justice system. However, based upon the facts before us, it appears that we were overly optimistic in that assessment. In the cases at bar, which have been joined for appellate review, both appellants argue that the actions of their squadron commander had a “chilling effect” on potential defense witnesses which deprived them of a fair trial. To…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. DuBayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
- United States v. RosserUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
- United States v. TreakleU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1984
- United States v. LittriceUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
- United States v. JohnsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. SerinoU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1987
- United States v. SmithU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1991
- United States v. AccordinoU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1985