Legal Opinion

United States v. Serino

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided July 29, 1987No. ACM 25835PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

STEWART, Judge.

The appellant was charged with fraternizing with two Air Force enlisted men by using marijuana with them in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice (U.C.M.J.), 10 U.S.C. § 934. He pleaded not guilty, but the military judge, sitting alone, found him guilty, by exceptions and substitutions, of fraternization by attending a party with the enlisted men during which and after which he condoned their use of marijuana. The approved sentence *850includes a dismissal and forfeiture of $1000.00 pay per month for three months.

The appellant filed an assignment of…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  2. United States v. DuBayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
  3. United States v. BakerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  4. United States v. RosserUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
  5. United States v. JohannsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. BoyettU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1993
  2. United States v. KingU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1989
  3. United States v. EvansU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1989
  4. United States v. OsburnU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API