Legal Opinion

United States v. Smith

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided June 27, 1991No. ACM 28173PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COUET

MILLS, Judge:

Contrary to his pleas, appellant Smith was found guilty by exceptions and substitutions of larceny and obstruction of justice by a military judge sitting alone as a general court-martial. The approved sentence is confinement for 3 years.

He now asserts that the military judge erred by forcing his trial defense counsel to be a witness against him, resulting in the severing of their attorney-client relationship. Smith asserts an additional error regarding sufficiency of evidence on the larceny charge and invites our attention to four other issues. We find no…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Clark v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. Carter v. McClaughrySupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  4. United States v. ColeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
  5. United States v. Maurice H. Friedman, United States of America v. Manuel JacobsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. SmithUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
  2. United States v. FassettDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
  3. United States v. EscobarUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API