United States v. Smith
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COUET
MILLS, Judge:
Contrary to his pleas, appellant Smith was found guilty by exceptions and substitutions of larceny and obstruction of justice by a military judge sitting alone as a general court-martial. The approved sentence is confinement for 3 years.
He now asserts that the military judge erred by forcing his trial defense counsel to be a witness against him, resulting in the severing of their attorney-client relationship. Smith asserts an additional error regarding sufficiency of evidence on the larceny charge and invites our attention to four other issues. We find no…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Clark v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Carter v. McClaughrySupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- United States v. ColeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
- United States v. Maurice H. Friedman, United States of America v. Manuel JacobsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. SmithUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
- United States v. FassettDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- United States v. EscobarUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2020