United States v. Accordino
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION UPON FURTHER REVIEW
HODGSON, Chief Judge:
In our earlier decision we refused to consider the affidavits of two court members * and held that the affiants were incompetent to impeach their own verdict. Thus, we did not consider whether the actions of the court-martial president, as alleged in the affidavits, amounted to “improper command influence.” United States v. Accordino, 15 M.J. 825 (A.F.C.M.R.1983). The Court of Military Appeals concluded that the affidavits should have been considered, and, on remand, returned the ease to us for that purpose. United States v. Accordino, 20 M.J.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. AccordinoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
- United States v. AccordinoU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1983
- United States v. TuckerU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1985