Legal Opinion
Bernhardt v. Labor & Industry Review Commission
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided November 13, 1996No. 95-3549PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, P.J.
Patricia K. Bernhardt and Candace A. Seib (Appellants) appeal from a judgment affirming the decision of the Labor and Industry Review Commission (LIRC), which held that Appellants were ineligible for unemployment compensation benefits. LIRC concluded that Appellants were suspended for good cause and were terminated by Briggs & Stratton Corporation for misconduct. Appellants contend that LIRC's finding that they participated in a "slowdown" contrary to specific language in the union contract is not supported by credible and substantial evidence. Appellants also liken National Labor Relations…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Boynton Cab Co. v. NeubeckWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
- Sauk County v. Wisconsin Employment Relations CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
- R. T. Madden, Inc. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- Princess House, Inc. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
- Moorman Manufacturing Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Kannenberg v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1997
- Lopez v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
- Haney v. Employment Security DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
- Milwaukee County v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2014
- Ashleson v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.