Legal Opinion

Moorman Manufacturing Co. v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided September 17, 1942PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.

Elliott was a salesman of the plaintiff’s stock food under a written contract designated a “Dealer’s Contract” in force when he filed a claim for unemployment compensation with the Industrial Commission which administers the Unemployment Compensation Act, hereinafter referred to as “the act.” The contract ran for a six months’ period. Pie had been selling plaintiff’s goods under such a contract or a similar one from April, 1937, to February, 1939, when hearing was had before the appeal tribunal. Under the contract referred to, the claimant had specific territory in which he might sell. He…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Northern Trust Co. v. SnyderWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Wisconsin Bridge & Iron Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Casper v. Kalt-Zimmers Manufacturing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Robinson v. KrennWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Princess House, Inc. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Stafford Trucking, Inc. v. State, Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981
  3. In Re Estate of HaeseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Nekoosa-Edwards Paper Co. v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Pinter Construction Co. v. FrisbyUtah Supreme Court · 1984

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API