Legal Opinion

Boynton Cab Co. v. Neubeck

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1941PublishedCited by 376 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFritz, J.

The Boynton Cab Company appeals from a judgment affirming a decision of the Industrial Commission by which it adopted and affirmed a decision of an appeal tribunal designated under sec. 108.09 (3), Stats., which allowed unemployment benefits under ch. 108, Stats., to be paid to Walter Neubeck. He had been employed as a taxicab driver by appellant from January 6, 1939, until he was discharged on February 25, 1939. He filed a claim for unemployment benefits, and pursuant to an inquiry made by the commission under sec. 108.09 (1), Stats., appellant rejected the claim by a letter stating,—

“Walter…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. v. Railroad CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Julius v. DruckreyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Krom v. Antigo Gas Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Groh v. W. O. Krahn, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Weirich v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by376 opinions

  1. Tilseth v. Midwest Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  2. Wheeler v. ArriolaMississippi Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Jackson v. Board of Review of the Department of LaborIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Sprouse v. MISSISSIPPI EMP. SEC. COM'NMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Milwaukee County v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977

371 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API