Legal Opinion
Kannenberg v. Labor & Industry Review Commission
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided September 18, 1997No. 97-0224PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtVergeront, J.
Aldene Kannenberg appeals the affirmance of a decision of the Labor and Industry Review Commission (LIRC) finding that she was not sexually harassed in her employment within the meaning of § 111.36(l)(b) and (br), Stats., and § 111.32(13), Stats., 1 and was not subjected to retaliation as prohib ited by § 111.322(3), Stats. 2 She contends that LIRC erred in the legal standards it applied to determine whether there was sexual harassment and that the evidence shows that she was subject to sexual harass ment and retaliation. We conclude that LIRC applied the correct legal standards on the sexual…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Andrews v. City of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Valerie A. Baskerville v. Culligan International CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Marguerite Hicks v. The Gates Rubber CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Hutson v. State Personnel CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- Stores v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1998
- Crystal Lake Cheese Factory v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- Stoughton Trailers, Inc. v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2006
- Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.