Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Sultana
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 30, 2010PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKavanagh, J.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment *1553Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 4, 2009, which ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because she had a reasonable assurance of continued employment.
Claimant, a per diem substitute teacher employed by the New York City Department of Education, worked a total of 138 days during the 2007-2008 school year. On June 13, 2008, claimant received a letter from the employer assuring her of continued employment during the upcoming 2008-2009 school year. The letter also informed claimant that the amount of work available…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In re the Claim of MurphyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- In re the Claim of SchwartzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- In re the Claim of HammondAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- In re the Claim of JeantyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- In re the Claim of PapapietroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
3Cited by11 opinions
- In re the Claim of MurphyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Matter of Cieszkowska (Commissioner of Labor)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Matter of Vazquez (Commr. of Labor)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Matter of Upham (Commr. of Labor)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- In re the Claim of CardinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.