Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Schwartz
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 10, 2009PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1324Claimant was employed by the New York City Department of Education during the 2007-2008 school year as a per diem substitute teacher for a total of 149 days. On June 13, 2008, the employer sent claimant a letter assuring her of continued employment during the upcoming 2008-2009 school year, with the amount of work available and the economic terms and conditions of employment to be substantially the same as in the previous year. Claimant applied for unemployment insurance benefits for the summer of 2008 and the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ultimately determined that she was ineligible…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re the Claim of MurphyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- In re the Claim of PapapietroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In re the Claim of CortorrealAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In re the Claim of JeantyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re the Claim of SultanaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- In re the Claim of MurphyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Matter of Upham (Commr. of Labor)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Matter of Papapietro (Commissioner of Labor)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Matter of Felipe (New York City Sch. Dist.--Commissioner of Labor)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019