In re the Claim of Hammond
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed March 31, 1997, which ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because she had a reasonable assurance of continued employment.
Claimant worked a total of 44 days as an occasional per diem substitute teacher for the 1995-1996 school year. By letter dated June 19, 1996, the employer informed claimant that her name would be maintained on a list from which occasional per diem substitute teachers would be hired for the 1996-1997 school year. The letter further advised claimant that it was…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In re the Claim of LuchunAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- In re the Clam of BicjanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re the Claim of SultanaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- In re the Claim of AloiaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- In re the Claims of GoodmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002