Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Jeanty

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 24, 2009PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed January 22, 2009, which ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he received a reasonable assurance of continued employment.

Claimant was employed as a pier diem substitute teacher by the New York City Department of Education during the 2007-2008 school year, during which he worked 123 days. In June 2008, the Department sent claimant a letter assuring him of continued employment as a per diem substitute teacher during the 2008-2009 school year, with the expectation that there…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of MurphyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. In re the Claim of PapapietroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. In re the Claim of CortorrealAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of SultanaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. In re the Claim of MurphyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. In re the Claim of SchwartzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API