Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Murphy
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 7, 2005PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed December 22, 2003, which ruled that claimant was eligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits.
Claimant worked 25 days as a per diem substitute teacher for the Copake-Taconic Central School District during the 2002-*7632003 school year. At the close of that school year, he received a letter from the District informing him that the District wished to retain him as a substitute teacher for the 2003-2004 school year and requesting that he sign and return the letter if he wished to continue. The letter did not inform…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re the Claim of MakisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- In re the Claim of AbramowitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- In re the Claim of MossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
3Cited by16 opinions
- In re the Claim of SultanaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Matter of Cieszkowska (Commissioner of Labor)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Matter of Vazquez (Commr. of Labor)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- In re the Claim of PapapietroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In re the Claim of SchwartzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.