Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Murphy
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 23, 2011PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 1, 2010, which ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because she had a reasonable assurance of continued employment.
*1479Claimant was employed as a per diem substitute teacher in Manhattan and the Bronx by the New York City Department of Education during the 2008-2009 school year for a total of 154 days. On June 12, 2009, claimant was sent a letter by the employer assuring her of continued employment during the upcoming 2009-2010 school year, with the amount of work available…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re the Claim of SultanaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- In re the Claim of SchwartzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- In re the Claim of JeantyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
3Cited by9 opinions
- Matter of Cieszkowska (Commissioner of Labor)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Matter of Vazquez (Commr. of Labor)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Matter of Rosenbaum (Commr. of Labor)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Matter of Papapietro (Commissioner of Labor)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- In re the Claim of CardinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.