Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Papapietro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 2, 2006PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed January 25, 2005, which ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he had received a reasonable assurance of continued employment.

Claimant worked as a substitute teacher for the Rochester City School District during the 2003-2004 academic year. He worked in excess of 90 days and earned approximately $12,000. Prior to the start of the 2004-2005 academic year, he received a letter from the District assuring him that he would continue to be employed as a substitute teacher during…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of MurphyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. In re the Claim of MakisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. In re the Claim of AloiaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of SultanaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. In re the Claim of PapapietroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API