Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Burkhalter

California Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1951No. L. A. 22005PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

A motor scooter ridden by Jon Peterson, a minor, and an automobile which Everett G. Burkhalter was driving collided at an intersection. The young man is suing for damages for personal injuries sustained at that time, and his father claims special damages for medical services. Burk-halter’s appeal from the judgment entered against him upon the verdict of a jury presents only the question as to the propriety of an instruction on the doctrine of last clear chance.

Stated most favorably to the giving of the instruction, the evidence shows the following facts:

Burkhalter was proceeding in his…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Girdner v. Union Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Bonebrake v. McCormickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Poncino v. Reid-Murdock & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. Choquette v. Key System Transit Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. Johnson v. Southwestern Engineering Co.California Court of Appeal · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Brandelius v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Daniels v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Rodabaugh v. TekusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Sills v. Los Angeles Transit LinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Doran v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API