Choquette v. Key System Transit Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Appeal by plaintiff from an order and judgment of nonsuit in an action brought by her against the Key System Transit Company and the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company for the recovery of damages for personal injuries suffered by reason of being struck by a train of the latter company while in the act of crossing its track in the city of Berkeley.
The Key System Transit Company (hereinafter sometimes referred to as the Key System) operates a double track railway along and over certain public streets in the city of Berkeley, including part of Sacramento Street, using in…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Richmond & Danville Railroad v. PowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Creamer v. West End Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
- Darling v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1925
- Young v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
- Holmes v. South Pacific Coast RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Brandelius v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Peterson v. BurkhalterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Johnson v. Sacramento Northern RailwayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Brandenburg v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1946
- Grier v. FerrantCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.