Legal Opinion

Doherty v. City of Detroit

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1928No. Docket No. 2, Calendar No. 33,742PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

The plaintiffs own lots on a boulevard, sometimes called Chicago boulevard, between Linwood avenue and Dexter boulevard, in Detroit. They seek, by this bill, to have vacated a special assessment for the widening and opening of the boulevard between Linwood and Dexter. They also pray that a special assessment for paving that portion of the boulevard be set aside. They had decree from which defendants have appealed.

We discuss first the assessment for paving. Under the city charter paving a boulevard is not a local improvement. Detroit Charter, tit. 6, chap. 3, § 2. Paving a street where…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dyckman v. . the Mayor, C. of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1851
  2. Scotten v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Borgman v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Lehmer v. People ex rel. MillerIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Lowrie & Robinson Lumber Co. v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Panfil v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Blanchard v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Oprisiu v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Campbell v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Meyer v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API